The Human Terrain Program Done Right: Legacy of the Soviet Partisan Movement and the Underground ...

“War’s nature is violent, interactive between opposing wills, and driven by politics. War’s character,  its conduct, constantly evolves under the influence of technology, moral forces (law or ethics), culture, and military culture, which also change across ti…
Amb. Ehtel Ferry · about 1 month ago · 3 minutes read


```html

The Enduring Legacy of the Soviet Partisan Movement: From WWII to Modern Warfare

The Human Element of War: Beyond Adaptability

The evolving character of war often emphasizes adaptability. However, understanding the human element, particularly the narratives shaping experiences, is equally crucial. At a fundamental level, shared stories and perceptions forge social identities, ultimately fueling a nation's will to fight.

Russia, throughout its various iterations, has consistently and effectively integrated this human element into its military art, recognizing the profound impact of socio-cognitive factors on resistance.

The Soviet Partisan Movement: A Foundation of Political Warfare

The Soviet partisan movement during WWII provides a crucial lens for understanding Russia's approach to resistance. More than just guerrilla warfare, it was a highly organized force deeply intertwined with the Red Army. Stalin himself recognized the power of the "people's militia," highlighting the crucial role of society in war.

"Comrades! Our forces are inestimable. The workers of Moscow and Leningrad have already begun to create a people’s militia of many thousands to support the Red Army.” - Joseph Stalin

This innovative approach, leveraging human terrain and local influence, significantly disrupted enemy operations and served as a potent psychological weapon.

The Origin Story: A Calculated Strategy

The Soviet partisan movement was no spontaneous uprising. It was meticulously planned and directed by the highest levels of Soviet leadership, with Stalin's July 3, 1941 speech marking the formal order for its establishment. The movement's objective extended beyond military disruption to include psychological warfare, aiming to create "unbearable conditions" for the enemy and collaborators.

The International Character: Shaping Narratives and Infiltrating Societies

The Soviet partisan movement, while diverse, was carefully curated to promote a specific narrative: the partisan as the righteous anti-fascist fighter defending the motherland and the Communist Party. This narrative effectively hijacked local resistance narratives in post-war Europe, suppressing alternative perspectives and shaping societal consciousness.

Beyond narrative control, the Soviets employed long-term infiltration strategies, placing operatives within the political, economic, and cultural spheres of satellite states, further solidifying their influence.

Applications in Contemporary Russian Operational Art: The War in Ukraine and Beyond

The war in Ukraine serves as a stark example of the enduring legacy of the Soviet partisan movement. Russia's strategic goals, including regime change, suppressing Ukrainian nationalism, and enforcing neutrality, are directly linked to this historical precedent. The influence of these tactics is evident in today's information environment, where Russia leverages narratives, psychological manipulation, and human terrain networks to advance its interests.

“The memory of our compatriots who participated in the Resistance movement is preserved, thanks to the efforts of specific people-historians and public activists." - Sergey Naryshkin, Chairman of the Russian Historical Society.

Conclusions: Understanding the Russian Cognitive Frame

The Soviet partisan movement has left a lasting impact on Russian strategic thinking. It is essential for Western strategists to understand this legacy, recognizing that Russia's approach extends beyond simple imperialism or authoritarianism. By acknowledging the profound influence of the partisan movement on Russian political and strategic culture, including its sophisticated human terrain networks, the West can develop more effective counter-strategies.

To effectively counter Russian influence operations, the West must move beyond simply identifying problem variables like authoritarianism and imperialism, and delve deeper into understanding the Russian cognitive frame. This requires a renewed focus on understanding how language, culture, and historical narratives shape Russian perceptions and behaviors.

```